VW Golf VI GTI Gets 11hp More & GTI-R to Replace R32

I think this car is going to be wicked nice!

The jetta has its own looks, making it look very different from a golf is a waste of money considering its limited to few markets. It makes more sense to just give the jetta a few tweaks here and there

Anyways, so the R32 is trading in it's current acronyms for GTI-R? If you ask me I think "GTI-R" is quite a mouthfull. R32 sounds so much better. And about this 265 hp thing.... Ok, so we have a claimed 265 hp, but what the torque number? What is that like? It should peform better without the weight of a VR6 powerplant fasten to the engine bay, but there is the 4Motion system in place. It may give it the extra scoot-to-60 power it needs, but the last time I checked, an AWD system straped to a European compact was sort of strenuous to that given vechicle. It will need a generous amout of torque to set a decent 0 to 60 time. I think VW should take a few ideas from their cusins to the south at Stuttgart and just take what they have and run with it. And by that; I meant take 2.0L and turn it into 2.5, use lighter materials when fabricating the moving innards of the powerplant. And for every good power train, there should be an exceptional suspension system to complement it. Feel free to borrow Audi's Magnetic Ride if need be the case (after all, you guys are family). All in all, they should really put thought and passion into it all (not like they've never done so before), when constructing the thing.

Call it the Golf R20 or something!

Back on topic: In all honesty, I have to agree with tootall here. With an AWD system, that car better be much lighter than its predecessor now, or have a tremendous amount of torque to produce good enough power to all four wheels, to have a decent naught-to-60 time. However, I will have to add ontop of tootall's post and say VW better improve their quality in their cars. Because an AWD system to fail or go bad can be quite expensive.

Cheers!

Anyway having driven the 2.0T, in an Audi though, I reckon it's a good thing that that VR6 engine is being laid to rest. It's a great engine and I reckon it will do the Golf GTi-R (or R20, whateva you wanna call it) better justice than the 3.2 V6.

Plus at high altitudes, my cousin burnt an R32 in his (almost) standard 2.0T Sportback.

Hopefully the new model should be sportier...

Cheers!

Your choice mate.

Cheers!

this 11 hp power increase, is kinda weird. i remember audi and vw, both had the 2.0L turbo in 2 powers: 200 bhp and 220 bhp. so they say that the new golf VI has a power increase, cause the droped the 220 engine, and incresed the power in the 200 engine? ..or what? cause to me, thsi sounds stupid. they might as well droped the 200 engine, keep the 220 engine, give it 11+ bhp..and the resutl is 231 bhp. now that's power increase, not what....they assume they achieved. besides, how much did it cost them to make this "enourmouuuss" power increase, 20$?..changing the air filter, or the muffler. wow...

Pocket rockets are for those whose pockets aren't deep enough.

http://www.motortrend.com/future/future_vehicles/112_0707_2010_volkswagen_new_beetle/index.html

I hope this is not true.

The render of the golf is bad. The basic is released, why it looks so unproportional then?!

Your got to be on crack cocaine mate! Its been a ploy from VW and the evidence is fact!

R32 Nissan Skyline 6cyl 89-94 ----- Golf R32 6cyl

GTi-R AWD 2lt turbo Nissan Pulsar 90-94 - ----- Golf AWD 2lt turbo Gti-R

GTR Nissan Skyline 89-2009 ------- WTF's next VW Golf GTR?

Wankers, trying to take Nissan's glory. Be original VW, it aint that hard nissan did it 10+ years ago!